| ARTICLE ARCHIVE |

In This Issue
Cover Story
Mending the Seams:
Financial Crisis Points to Need for
International Regulatory Reform

Features
Independent Research:
Salvation in the Middle Market

A Watershed Moment:
Calculating the Risks of
Impending Water Shortages

Investing in Troubled Times:
Entrepreneurs Are Your Safest Bet

Team of Rivals:
Can Corporate America and Academia Reconcile Their Worldviews and Work Together?

Departments
From the
Executive Director

Providing Continuity and Diversity

Letters to the Editor

Hot Zones
Ignorance Is Not Bliss:
The Dangers of Taking a
Set-It-and-Forget-It Approach
to Target-Date Funds

Hot Zones
The Seat Belt Problem:
A New Approach to Calculating
Risk-Adjusted Returns

Hot Zones
Advance Your Advisory Practice:
Steps for Implementing the RIA Business Model

Worldview
Shifting Sands:
Egypt Delivers Impressive
Results—But With Risks

Education for Practice
The Problem of Loss:
A Primer on Value at Risk

Education for Practice
Calculating Solvency:
Creating a Z-Score Calculator
on Your PDA

Education for Practice
Sounder Grounds for Prediction:
Deriving a Forward-Looking
Equity Market Risk Premium

Careers
The Sustainability Education Gap:
How Business Programs Fail (and Succeed) at Integrating Sustainability

Careers
Landing a Government Job:
Public-Sector Careers Offer
Security in Tough Times

Case Study
Revisiting StoneRidge:
Congress Could Restore
Aiders’ and Abettors’ Liability

Interview
Picking Up the Pieces:
Stephen Harbeck and Irving Picard
on the Lehman and Madoff Cases

Book Reviews
Extending the Canon:
New Titles

Final Analysis
Two Cartoons

Education for Practice Education for Practice

Calculating Solvency
Creating a Z-Score Calculator on Your PDA

Edward I. Altman’s z-score for predicting bankruptcy, introduced in 1968, was the precursor of credit-scoring models. Its application has since expanded to measure more than the publicly traded manufacturing companies investigated in Altman’s original paper. Using the following template—based on a paper by Arnold and Earl (2006)—you will be able to create a z-score calculator for your PDA. (In this case, we used an HP iPAQ PDA with Windows Mobile). While PDAs cannot take advantage of some of the Excel capabilities available on a PC, the Windows Mobile environment is functional enough to create a z-score template.

The z-score is based on a set of five ratios: X1 = (current assets - current liabilities) ÷ total assets; X2 = retained earnings ÷ total assets; X3 = EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes) ÷ total assets; X4 = (stock price × outstanding shares) ÷ total liabilities; and X5 = sales ÷ total assets. The z-score is defined as an equation with the five ratios: z = 1.2 × X1 + 1.4 × X2 + 3.3 × X3 + 0.6 × X4 + 0.999 × X5. A z-score below 1.81 indicates a high probability of failure, and a z-score above 2.99 indicates solvency. A z-score between 1.81 and 2.99 is inconclusive but generally not viewed as a positive sign.

The template requires nine readily available inputs: current assets, total assets, current liabilities, total liabilities, retained earnings, sales, EBIT, share price, and shares outstanding (see Figure 1). To finish the template, enter the coefficients into cells adjacent to the relevant ratio. The z-score is a matter of computing the above equation through cell references.

In the example below, the formulas entered into cells B13–B19 appear in red, and the results of the formulas appear in black. For these cells, only enter the red portion when replicating this template in Excel.

Figure 1: Z-Score Template
| Download the Template |

Figure 1: Z-Score Template

Coefficients are designated in individual cells because nonmanufacturing and private firms use different coefficients for calculating the z-score than those shown in this example. However, if such flexibility within the template is not necessary, the template can be made more compact (see Figure 2).

Figure 2: Compact Z-Score Template
| Download the Template |

Figure 2: Compact Z-Score Template

The z-score is still a very popular measure of solvency, and given the computational ease of the z-score—which requires only readily available data—it is well worth referencing as an initial measure of solvency.

REFERENCES

Altman, Edward I., and Herbert A. Rijken. November 2004. “How Rating Agencies Achieve Rating Stability.” Journal of Banking and Finance, vol. 28, no. 11. 2679–2714.

Arnold, Tom, and John H. Earl, Jr. Summer 2006. “Applying Altman’s Z-Score in the Classroom.” Journal of Financial Education, vol. 32. 98–103.

Tom Arnold, PhD, CFA; John H. Earl Jr., PhD, CFA; and David S. North, PhD, are associate professors of finance at the Robins School of Business at the University of Richmond.

copyright © 2009 the new york society of security analysts, inc. all rights reserved. | contact