| ARTICLE ARCHIVE |

In This Issue
Cover Story
Danse Macabre:
The Banking and Brokerage Sectors Reel from Crisis to Crisis

Features
Don’t Shoot the Messenger:
The Unfair Attack on
Fair Value Accounting

Crisis Mode:
Modern Porfolio Theory
under Pressure

Hive Mind:
Organizational Psychology and the Origins of the Financial Crisis

The New You:
The Future of Securities Analysis

Departments
From the
Executive Director

Balancing the Scales

Letters to
the Editor

On the first research departments, Harry Markopolos

Hot Zones
Plug In and Play:
The Current Is Flowing in
Electric Grid Investing

Hot Zones
Refactoring Research:
Analysts and Asset Managers Confront the New Model for
Information

Worldview
On the Shores of the Black Sea:
Will Romania’s
Economy Sink or Swim?

Careers
Wearing Two Hats:
Transitioning into the Personal Financial Planning Sector

Careers
Breathing Room:
Entrepreneurism and HR Outsourcing

Case Study
The Ghost of Credit Past: The Specter of the Heilig-Meyers Fiasco Haunts Today’s Failed Lenders

Interview
The Great Divide: Talking to
Lee Cooperman about Buy-Side
and Sell-Side Research

Book Reviews
Extending the Canon:
New Titles

Final Analysis
Two Cartoons

Letters to the Editor

In the Beginning

I very much enjoyed Charles Ellis’s article on the changing role of the securities analyst (“Coming of Age,” Winter 2009) and feel his description of the evolution of the industry is accurate. I join him in hoping that the profession continues to regain respect and do work of real value. However, his depiction of the early history of the analyst is not complete without a discussion of the roles of Shearson, Hammill & Company or Smith Barney.

When I joined Shearson in 1960, it was known as “the firm that research built.” I believe that Shearson’s fundamental research department, which Murray Safanie started in 1919, was the industry’s first. The senior management was comprised entirely of analysts—from Walter Maynard to Walter Mintz and Donald Cecil. The sales and asset management businesses were built around equity research, and we launched a very successful annual report titled “Uncommon Values in Common Stocks.” Smith Barney also had a business model built around research, and the two companies were the first brokerage firms to launch retail mutual funds.

Heath McLendon
Retired from Citigroup Smith Barney

The Shot Heard Round the World

Harry Markopolos

© 2009 Gail Samuelson

Harry Markopolos holds up a silver whistle presented to him by the Boston Security Analysts Society, February 11, 2009.

I first met Harry Markopolos in 2002 at a society leaders meeting of AIMR (Association of Investment Management and Research, now CFA Institute). At the time, he was president of the Boston Security Analysts Society and was conducting a meeting including volunteer presidents and officers from the largest of the more than 100 Chartered Financial Analyst® societies around the world. Having been involved with options for most of my career, I was particularly interested in meeting Harry since he was chief investment officer of one of the largest institutional option managers in the country, Rampart Investments.

Harry conducted the meeting brilliantly. His forceful and engaging manner would, years later, be showcased both before Congress and on 60 Minutes. He had a way of phrasing and emphasizing points that made his comments simply unforgettable. His “Roar like a mouse and bite like a flea” statement to Congress and “Toe-tag the victims, count the bodies, and try to figure out who the crooks were” line on 60 Minutes are prime examples of his vernacular. Behind comments like these, which often succeed in estranging people of power and position, is a terrifically insightful and intelligent person.

Harry first contacted me about Bernard Madoff in 2005, soon after he left Rampart Investments. He laid out his suspicions cogently and asked my opinion. I confirmed his misgivings about the remarkable consistency of returns and lack of a trail of trades, and later that year Harry rewarded me for the brief time we spent on this conversation by listing me as an expert in his SEC submission. In the daily frenzy of managing investment positions, I had almost forgotten our discussion when the Madoff scandal finally broke and Harry’s fears were confirmed.

Harry had begun his vigil by trying to uncover an unethical business competitor. Once he’d left Rampart, his continuing commitment to the investigation was spurred more by his passion to right what was wrong than by his desire to enhance his position in the investment business (although his fraud examination practice did benefit from the subsequent publicity). Like a bulldog, he kept attacking. But unfortunately for everyone, Madoff’s downfall came about with the collapse of the Ponzi scheme rather than because of a preemptive strike by Harry. For regulators, Harry’s logical conclusions were worthless without hard evidence from an insider.

Harry Markopolos, an unassuming investment professional, has fired a volley of bull’s-eye shots at the greed and shamelessly blind ambition that are far from being pathologies peculiar to Madoff alone. Markopolos’s solitary activism, fine intellect, and dogged persistence need not be such rare qualities; they should be the model for professionalism in this industry.

Walter V. (Bud) Haslett Jr., CFA, FRM
CFA Institute
Editorial board,
The Investment Professional


Send letters to editor@theinvestmentprofessional.com.

copyright © 2009 the new york society of security analysts, inc. all rights reserved. | contact